Eurotransplant Senior Program ‘old for old’: results from 10 patients
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Transplantation
- Vol. 15 (2) , 100-105
- https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0012.2001.150204.x
Abstract
More frequently there is the need for renal transplantation of older patients. Against the background of an increasing number of old donors and recipients, Eurotransplant Leiden started the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) ‘old for old’ in 1999. The ESP works with donors and recipients both over 65 yr. The kidneys are transplanted with short cold ischaemia time regardless of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility. Compatibility of blood groups, negative crossmatch and less than 5% cytotoxic antibodies are required. First experiences from 10 patients at Heinrich Heine University hospital are reported here. The course of 10 transplanted patients is described from January 1999 until November 1999 (28.4±15.8 wk). Age of donor and recipient, cause of dialysis and concomitant diseases from recipients, function of the transplanted kidney and complications are analysed. Immunosuppression consisted initially of cyclosporin A, mycophenolic acid and steroids. The results of these 10 patients were compared to 14 patients who were transplanted according to the ordinary Eurotransplant criteria (Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System) in the same period of time. Kidneys from six donors (70.5±3.3 yr) were transplanted to 10 different recipients (66.9±2.2 yr). The control group consisted of 14 patients (47.6±14.4 yr) who received kidneys from 14 donors (48.3±10.1 yr). One double kidney transplantation was performed in the senior group, i.e. two kidneys from a marginal donor were transplanted to one recipient (‘two in one’). In the ESP group, cold ischaemia time was reduced by 5 h and mean of HLA mismatches was more than doubled. Mean length of hospitalisation of ESP and control groups was 47.2±28.2 and 34.2±11.6 d, respectively. Intraoperatively, no complications were seen, post‐operative care was performed on a normal ward. ESP patients suffered more often from delayed graft function, which led to further need for haemodialysis for 11.2 d. Finally, 9 of 10 patients acquired a satisfactory renal graft function. A total of 13 biopsies were performed in eight cases. Altogether seven acute rejections in 6 patients were found (four interstitial, one vascular, one interstitial+vascular, one clinical). The 9 patients with sufficient renal graft function were discharged with a mean serum creatinine level of 2.3±0.5 mg/dL (control: 1.9±0.8 mg/dL). Comparing these 10 recipients to a control group consisting of 14 patients, the results are comparable and encouraging. In conclusion, the short‐term results of the ESP are promising. Nevertheless, the post‐operative care requires more attention due to several complications. Though the HLA compatibility was not considered, all rejections were coped with effectively. Quality of life was improved.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Mortality in All Patients on Dialysis, Patients on Dialysis Awaiting Transplantation, and Recipients of a First Cadaveric TransplantNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Analysis of factors that affect outcome of primary cadaveric renal transplantation in the UKThe Lancet, 1999
- Dual kidney transplantation: older donors for older recipients11No competing interests declared.Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 1999
- Cadaver kidney graft outcome in relation to ischemia time and HLA matchTransplantation Proceedings, 1998
- What is a reasonably short cold ischemia time in kidney transplantation?Transplantation Proceedings, 1998
- PrologueTransplantation Proceedings, 1998
- RENAL TRANSPLANTATION WITH LIMIT DONORSTransplantation, 1998
- THE NEW EUROTRANSPLANT KIDNEY ALLOCATION SYSTEM1Transplantation, 1998
- FIT AND MATCH HYPOTHESIS FOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION1Transplantation, 1996
- Analysis of Cadaver Donor Criteria on the Kidney Transplant Survival Rate in 5,129 TransplantationsJournal of Urology, 1995