Autonomy Reconsidered
- 4 April 2002
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 346 (14) , 1087-1089
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200204043461413
Abstract
In 2001, 50 percent of deaths of Medicare beneficiaries occurred in hospitals, often after stays in intensive care units, visits to multiple physicians in the months before death, and enormous expenditures for treatments intended to prolong life.1 Many argue that it is ethical to provide marginally effective treatments if sick patients want them, regardless of the resulting quality of life. However, this approach entails substantial trade-offs2 — expensive procedures are reimbursed under Medicare, whereas prescription medications, nursing home care, and home care services are not. We have done little to address these trade-offs in the United States, since a long . . .Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding the Treatment Preferences of Seriously Ill PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Aortic StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Physician-Assisted Suicide in Oregon — An Uncertain FutureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Preliminary Evidence of Impaired Thinking in Sick PatientsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Influence of Patient Preferences and Local Health System Characteristics on the Place of DeathJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1998
- Opening the Black Box: How Do Physicians Communicate about Advance Directives?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1998
- Health Values of Hospitalized Patients 80 Years or OlderJAMA, 1998
- Health Values of the Seriously IllAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Advance directives. Stability of patients' treatment choicesArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1994
- Judgment under UncertaintyPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1982