Divergent selection on locomotor activity inDrosophila melanogaster. II. Test for reproductive isolation between selected lines
- 1 November 1979
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Behavior Genetics
- Vol. 9 (6) , 555-561
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01067351
Abstract
Tests for reproductive isolation between lines selected for locomotor activity were performed. Three sets of selection lines were used, each consisting of lines selected for low and high locomotor activity from the same base population. Females preferred high-activity males in almost every case. However, in one of the sets temporary sexual isolation was found between flies of the high and low lines. This was accompanied in the low-activity females with a higher fertility when they were mated with their own males. After further selection the partial isolation disappeared.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Divergent selection on locomotor activity inDrosophila melanogaster. I. Selection responseBehavior Genetics, 1979
- Asymmetrical responses to automatic selection for body size in Drosophila melanogasterTheoretical and Applied Genetics, 1976
- Einflüsse von Geschlecht und Alter auf die lokomotorische Aktivität von DrosophilaJournal of Insect Physiology, 1971
- Sexual isolation caused by selection for positive and negative phototaxis and geotaxis in Drosophila pseudoobscura.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1966
- A STUDY OF SEXUAL ISOLATION BETWEEN CERTAIN STRAINS OF DROSOPHILA PAULISTORUMEvolution, 1965
- The effects of inbreeding and artificial selection on reproductive fitnessGenetics Research, 1962
- The effects of artificial selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogasterAnimal Behaviour, 1961
- The Origin of Sexual Isolation Between Different Lines Within a SpeciesEvolution, 1958
- Studies in quantitative inheritance. VII. Crosses between strains of different body size in Drosophila melanogaster.1955
- REVERSIBILITY IN EVOLUTION CONSIDERED FROM THE STANDPOINT OF GENETICS1Biological Reviews, 1939