Behavioral Expectation Scales versus Nonanchored and Trait Rating Systems: A Sales Personnel Application
- 1 January 1980
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Applied Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 4 (1) , 131-133
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168000400113
Abstract
There are presently available several empirical comparisons between behavioral expectation scales (BES) and other rating scales (Bernardin, 1977; Borman & Dunnette, 1975; Burnaska & Hollman, 1974; Keaveny & McGann, 1975). In many of these studies the rater-ratee population has consisted of faculty members and students (Bernardin, 1977; Keaveny & McGann, 1975; Schwab, Heneman, & Decotiis, 1975). Only a handful of scientifically sound investigations comparing BES and other rating scales have used manager-subordinate populations. The importance of sales personnel in organizations, the general lack of previous research using sales employees as subjects in examining BES, and the significance of performance evaluation prompted the present study. Specifically, the study examined estimates of rating leniency, halo error, interrater agreement, and the degree of ratee differentiation of BES, nonanchored, and trait evaluation systemsKeywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Behavioral expectation scales versus summated scales: A fairer comparison.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREPersonnel Psychology, 1975
- A comparison of behavioral expectation scales and graphic rating scales.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975
- Behavior-based versus trait-oriented performance ratings: An empirical study.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975
- Spin-offs from behavioral expectation scale procedures.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974
- An empirical comparison of the relative effects of rater response biases on three rating scale formats.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974