A Clinical Trial Comparing Primary Coronary Angioplasty with Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Open Access
- 5 June 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 336 (23) , 1621-1628
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199706053362301
Abstract
Among physicians who treat patients with acute myocardial infarction, there is controversy about the magnitude of the clinical benefit of primary (i.e., immediate) coronary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy. Methods As part of the Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO IIb) trial, we randomly assigned 1138 patients from 57 hospitals who presented within 12 hours of acute myocardial infarction (with ST-segment elevation on the electrocardiogram) to primary angioplasty or accelerated thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). We also randomly assigned 1012 patients to heparin or hirudin treatment in a factorial design. The primary study end point was a composite outcome of death, nonfatal reinfarction, and nonfatal disabling stroke at 30 days. Results The incidence of the primary end point in the angioplasty and t-PA groups was 9.6 percent and 13.7 percent, respectively (odds ratio, 0.67; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.47 to 0.97; P = 0.033). Death occurred in 5.7 percent of the patients assigned to angioplasty and 7.0 percent of those assigned to t-PA (P = 0.37), reinfarction in 4.5 percent and 6.5 percent (P = 0.13), and disabling stroke in 0.2 percent and 0.9 percent (P = 0.11). At six months, there was no significant difference in the incidence of the composite outcome (14.1 percent vs. 16.1 percent, P not significant). The primary end point was observed in 10.6 percent of the patients in the angioplasty group assigned to heparin and 8.2 percent of those assigned to hirudin (P = 0.37). Conclusions This trial suggests that angioplasty provides a small-to-moderate, short-term clinical advantage over thrombolytic therapy with t-PA. Primary angioplasty, when it can be accomplished promptly at experienced centers, should be considered an excellent alternative method for myocardial reperfusion.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Thrombolytic Therapy with Primary Coronary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Primary angioplasty versus thrombolysis in inferior acute myocardial infarction with anterior ST-segment depression, a single-center randomized studyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Fibrinolytics vs primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (FAP): A randomized trial in a community hospital in ArgentinaJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Link Between the Angiographic Substudy and Mortality Outcomes in a Large Randomized Trial of Myocardial ReperfusionCirculation, 1995
- The Effects of Tissue Plasminogen Activator, Streptokinase, or Both on Coronary-Artery Patency, Ventricular Function, and Survival after Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- An International Randomized Trial Comparing Four Thrombolytic Strategies for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Randomized trial of direct coronary angioplasty versus intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- Impact of early perfusion status of the infarct-related artery on short-term mortality after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: Retrospective analysis of four german multicenter studiesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- Immediate Angioplasty Compared with the Administration of a Thrombolytic Agent Followed by Conservative Treatment for Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- A Comparison of Immediate Coronary Angioplasty with Intravenous Streptokinase in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993