Incidental Carcinoma of the Prostate at the Time of Transurethral Resection: Importance of Evaluating Every Chip
- 1 November 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 128 (5) , 948-950
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53293-0
Abstract
Incidental adenocarcinoma of the [human] prostate has been divided into stage A1, less than 3 foci of well differentiated adenocarcinoma present, and stage A2, 3 or more foci or poorly differentiated tumor present. The clinical significance of these 2 stages is well documented: stage A1 lesions cause no increased mortality, while up to 30% of patients with clinical stage A2 disease will have positive pelvic lymph nodes at exploration and surgical stage D1 tumor. Most pathology laboratories submit only a fraction of the transurethral resection chips for permanent blocks. To evaluate the over-all incidence and distribution of stages A1 and A2 lesions a prospective study was begun in 1978 whereby all prostatic chips were submitted for permanent sections. A review of 500 consecutive cases of transurethral resection for clinically benign prostates before 1978 revealed 43 cases of adenocarcinoma: 10 (23%) stage A1 and 33 (77%) stage A2. A review of a similar series of 500 consecutive patients since 1978 revealed 71 cases of adenocarcinoma: 17 (24%) clinical stage A1 and 54 (76%) clinical stage A2. Since 1978 incidental adenocarcinoma of the prostate has increased by 65% and the distribution of stages A1 and A2 lesions has remained unchanged, 76% of these lesions being clinical stage A2 with its much greater clinical significance. Evaluation of every chip does make a clinically significant difference in the subsequent management of patients with incidental adenocarcinoma of the prostate.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stage a prostate cancer from pathologist's viewpointUrology, 1981
- Incidental Carcinoma of the Prostate: a Review of the Literature and Critical Reappraisal of ClassificationJournal of Urology, 1980
- Stage A2 prostatic carcinoma Should staging system be reclassified?Urology, 1979
- Differences in Pathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Clinical A2 Prostatic Cancer from A1 and B DiseaseJournal of Urology, 1978
- Pelvic lymphadenectomy in stage a prostatic cancerUrology, 1977
- “Prevalence” of Prostatic CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Increased Prevalence of Prostatic Carcinoma Due to More Thorough Microscopical ExaminationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Treatment of Stage 1 Carcinoma of the Prostate: A Preliminary ReportJournal of Urology, 1971
- Carcinoma of the Prostate in Elderly Men: Incidence, Growth Characteristics and Clinical SignificanceJournal of Urology, 1969
- Occult Prostatic Carcinoma Diagnosed by the Step-section Technique of the Surgical SpecimenJournal of Urology, 1965