Prospective study of the effectiveness of retrobulbar and peribulbar anesthesia for anterior segment surgery
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 18 (2) , 162-165
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80924-8
Abstract
Peribulbar anesthesia was performed in 407 patients and retrobulbar anesthesia in 441 patients in a prospective study comparing the efficacy and complication rate of the two procedures. Eighteen of the peribulbar procedures (4.4%) required reblocks. There were no major complications in this group. Thirty of the retrobulbar procedures (6.8%) required reblocks. This group also had no major complications. The chi-square method of statistical analysis (chi-square = 2.245; P = .134) indicates there was no statistically significant difference between the efficacy of the two local anesthesia methods.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ocular Perforation From a Retrobulbar InjectionAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1988
- Ocular Complications Associated with Retrobulbar InjectionsOphthalmology, 1988
- Administration of periocular anesthesiaJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1986
- Posterior peribulbar anesthesia: An alternative to retrobulbar anesthesiaJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1986
- Current concepts in retrobulbar anesthesiaSurvey of Ophthalmology, 1985
- Retrobulbar Anesthesia and Retinal Vascular ObstructionOphthalmology, 1983
- Central Retinal Artery Occlusion without Retrobulbar Hemorrhage after Retrobulbar AnesthesiaAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1982
- The CT-topography of retrobulbar anesthesiaAlbrecht von Graefes Archiv für Ophthalmologie, 1981
- Occlusion of the Central Retinal Artery After Retrobulbar Corticosteroid InjectionAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1978
- Occlusion of the Central Retinal Artery Following Retrobulbar HemorrhageOphthalmologica, 1967