A Comparison of Three Chemotherapeutic Regimens in the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic and Gastric Carcinoma
- 12 April 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 253 (14) , 2061-2067
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1985.03350380077025
Abstract
Three hundred five patients with advanced pancreatic and gastric carcinoma were randomly assigned to treatment with fluorouracil, fluorouracil plus doxorubicin (Adriamycin) (FA), or fluorouracil plus doxorubicin plus mitomycin (mitomycin C) (FAM). All regimens were equivalent with regard to patient survival. There is no reasonable likelihood that either the FA or FAM regimen could produce a meaningful survival advantage over fluorouracil alone. Interval to disease progression, objective response rates, and palliative effects (improved performance, body weight, or symptoms) were essentially equivalent among the three regimens. With regard to toxicity, the FAM regimen produced more anorexia, nausea, vomiting, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and cumulative bone marrow suppression. Fluorouracil alone produced more stomatitis and diarrhea. Because of a failure to produce improved survival or palliation, unrewarded toxicity, and excessive cost, neither the FA nor FAM regimen can be recommended for the treatment of advanced pancreatic or gastric cancer. (JAMA1985;253:2061-2067)Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 1984CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1984
- A review of chemotherapy in gastric cancerCancer, 1974