Congenital visual impairment and ‘theory of mind’
- 1 June 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Developmental Psychology
- Vol. 16 (2) , 183-196
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835x.1998.tb00918.x
Abstract
On theoretical grounds, Hobson (1990) suggested that lack of vision might delay the emergence of so‐called ‘theory of mind’ in congenitally blind children. This prediction was tested using tactile versions of theory of mind tasks devised by Perner, Leekam & Wimmer (1987) and Wimmer & Perner (1983). Twenty‐one visually impaired children were group matched for chronological age and verbal intelligence with 21 sighted children. All of the children who participated in the study had mental ages over the age of 4 years. Visually impaired children's performance on the two theory of mind tasks was significantly poorer than that of their sighted peers, but most of the children could make some adjustment to another person's false beliefs. The possible sources and implications of these findings are discussed with reference to accounts of ‘theory of mind’ development.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are There “Autistic‐like” Features in Congenitally Blind Children?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1997
- On acquiring knowledge about people and the capacity to pretend: Response to Leslie (1987).Psychological Review, 1990
- The theoretical implications of joint-attention deficits in autismDevelopment and Psychopathology, 1989
- Social Characteristics of Visually Impaired Infants' PlayTopics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1984