William Godwin and the Defence of Impartialist Ethics
- 1 May 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Utilitas
- Vol. 7 (1) , 67-86
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0953820800001850
Abstract
Impartialism in ethics has been said to be the common ground shared by both Kantian and utilitarian approaches to ethics. Lawrence Blum describes this common ground as follows: Both views identify morality with a perspective of impartiality, impersonality, objectivity and universality. Both views imply the ‘ubiquity of impartiality” – that our commitments and projects derive their legitimacy only by reference to this impartial perspective.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- FriendshipPublished by Cornell University Press ,1993
- Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest ObjectionEthics, 1991
- Utilitarian Morality and the Personal Point of ViewThe Journal of Philosophy, 1986
- The Archangel and the ProlePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1981
- The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical TheoriesThe Journal of Philosophy, 1976
- Forms and Limits of UtilitarianismPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1965
- VI.—Utilitarianism, Universalisation, and Our Duty to be JustProceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback), 1953
- Archbishop fenelon versus my motherAustralasian Journal of Philosophy, 1950