Should Significance Tests be Banned? Introduction to a Special Section Exploring the Pros and Cons
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 8 (1) , 1-2
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00533.x
Abstract
Significance testing of null hypotheses is the standard epistemological method for advancing scientific knowledge in psychology, even though it has drawbacks and it leads to common inferential mistakes These mistakes include accepting the null hypothesis when it fails to be rejected, automatically interpreting rejected null hypotheses as theoretically meaningful, and failing to consider the likelihood of Type II errors Although these mistakes have been discussed repeatedly for decades, there is no evidence that the academic discussion has had an impact A group of methodologists is proposing a new approach simply ban significance tests in psychology journals The impact of a similar ban in public-health and epidemiology journals is reportedKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychology Will Be a Much Better Science When We Change the Way We Analyze DataCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 1996
- Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers.Psychological Methods, 1996
- The earth is round (p < .05).American Psychologist, 1994
- Four comments received on statistical testing and confidence intervals.American Journal of Public Health, 1987
- Beyond the confidence interval.American Journal of Public Health, 1987
- Statistical criteria in the interpretation of epidemiologic data.American Journal of Public Health, 1987
- Significance tests have a role in epidemiologic research: reactions to A. M. Walker.American Journal of Public Health, 1986
- Reporting the results of epidemiologic studies.American Journal of Public Health, 1986
- The test of significance in psychological research.Psychological Bulletin, 1966
- The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test.Psychological Bulletin, 1960