Figural After-Effects, Retinal Size, and Apparent Size
Open Access
- 1 March 1954
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 6 (1) , 35-44
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17470215408416648
Abstract
The results of earlier experiments on the question of whether figural after-effects are affected by apparent as opposed to retinal size are shown to be inconclusive. A new hypothesis is proposed namely that both factors may be responsible for producing figural aftereffects, and four experiments have been made to test it. Situations were used in which the apparent sizes of the figures were determined by the size-constancy effect. It was found that where retinal sizes of test and inspection figures are the same and apparent sizes are different, figural after-effects in the direction which would be predicted on the basis of apparent sizes are obtained. It was further shown that where retinal and apparent sizes are in conflict, whether a figural after-effect is seen or not, and the direction of the figural after-effect, depends upon the balance between these two factors.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new interpretation of figural after-effects.Psychological Review, 1952
- Figural After-Effects as a Function of the Retinal Size of the Inspection-FigureThe American Journal of Psychology, 1951
- On the Size of the Figural After-Effect with Varying DistancesThe American Journal of Psychology, 1950
- The Relation of Distance to the Apparent Size of Figural After-EffectsThe American Journal of Psychology, 1947
- Figural After-Effects in the Third Dimension of Visual SpaceThe American Journal of Psychology, 1947