A comparison of relative quantification with isobaric tags on a subset of the murine hepatic proteome using electrospray ionization quadrupole time‐of‐flight and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization tandem time‐of‐flight

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The use of isobaric tagging for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) has increased dramatically over the past few years. Many factors can affect the accuracy of quantification. Some of these include the number of biological/technical replicates, sample complexity, instrumentation, method of peptide/protein identification and the statistical techniques used for data analysis. It has been observed that the low collision energies normally used in electrospray ionization quadrupole time‐of‐flight (ESI QTOF) can result in low iTRAQ reporter ion abundances. We used two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the iTRAQ ratios that were generated on an ESI QTOF and a matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization tandem time‐of‐flight (MALDI TOF/TOF). It appears that iTRAQ analyses performed on an ESI QTOF without any special modifications to instrumental parameters produce essentially the same protein ratios as those obtained on a MALDI TOF/TOF. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Funding Information
  • Environmental Health Sciences Center (2P30ES000210)
  • The Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station (ORE00871)
  • National Institutes of Health (T32 ES007060)