Measures of Effectiveness in Large-scale Bioterrorism Events
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
- Vol. 18 (3) , 258-262
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x0000114x
Abstract
Measures of effectiveness (MOEs) are defined as operationally quantifiable management tools that provide a means for measuring effectiveness, outcome, and performance. No clear MOEs exist for determining success or failure of the management of a bioterrorism response. This is especially critical because management requires a multi-agency and multi-disciplinary decision-making and evaluation process. It is suggested that the minimum MOEs required to operationally measure outcome must contain a measuring response capacity for: (1) real-time public health surveillance system; (2) full coverage health information system; (3) capacity to measure variance across management timelines; (4) demonstrated decline in mortality and morbidity; (5) control of transmission rates of communicable agents; and (6) resource distribution across the entire population.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Community Reaction to Bioterrorism: Prospective Study of Simulated OutbreakEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Mass casualty management of a large-scale bioterrorist event: an epidemiological approach that shapes triage decisionsEmergency Medicine Clinics of North America, 2002
- Transmission potential of smallpox in contemporary populationsNature, 2001
- Infectious disease epidemiology theory & practiceDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 2001
- Complex, Humanitarian Emergencies: III. Measures of EffectivenessPrehospital and Disaster Medicine, 1995
- How the Choice of Measures of Effectiveness Constrains Operational AnalysisInterfaces, 1979