Typical Performance, Maximal Performance, and Performance Variability: Expanding Our Understanding of How Organizations Value Performance
- 23 May 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Human Performance
- Vol. 20 (3) , 259-274
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280701333289
Abstract
Existing research has distinguished between typical and maximal performance. Performance variability is another potentially important aspect of performance that has been infrequently studied. Using longitudinal data from the National Basketball Association (N = 269), we address this gap by examining how these three conceptualizations of performance are related to how organizations compensate their employees. Results indicate that each of these performance aspects is bivariately related to compensation levels, accounting for between 32% and 58% of the variance in compensation. In addition, typical performance and performance variability incrementally predicts compensation levels, although maximal performance does not. Implications for research and practice are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new researchOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2005
- Intraindividual Variability and Level of Performance in Four Visuo-Spatial Working Memory TasksSwiss Journal of Psychology, 2004
- Reactions to merit pay increases: A longitudinal test of a signal sensitivity perspective.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003
- CHINESE AND AMERICAN MANAGERS' COMPENSATION AWARD DECISIONS: A COMPARATIVE POLICY‐CAPTURING STUDYPersonnel Psychology, 2001
- Choosing Work Group Members: Balancing Similarity, Competence, and FamiliarityOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2000
- A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual PerformanceHuman Performance, 1997
- Age, variability, and speed: Between-subjects diversity.Psychology and Aging, 1988
- Personality: Nomothetic or idiographic? A response to Kenrick and Stringfield.Psychological Review, 1981
- The influence of variations in performance profiles on the performance evaluation process: An examination of the validity of the criterionOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974