Adenomyosis and leiomyoma: differential diagnosis with MR imaging.
- 1 May 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 163 (2) , 527-529
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.163.2.3562836
Abstract
To assess the capability of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to enable differentiation of adenomyosis from leiomyoma, a prospective study was performed in 21 premenopausal patients with a strong clinical suggestion of adenomyosis. Histologic findings from hysterectomy (19 patients) and biopsy specimens (two patients) showed that eight patients had adenomyosis (three focal, five diffuse) and 12 had leiomyomas (five of the 12 also had microscopic foci of adenomyosis); one patient had a normal uterus. All eight cases of adenomyosis were correctly diagnosed from MR images. On T2-weighted MR images, diffuse adenomyosis appeared as a thickening of the junctional zone, whereas focal adenomyosis appeared as a low-signal-intensity mass poorly marginated from the adjacent myometrium. Ten of the 12 leiomyomas were correctly diagnosed from MR images. In the other two cases of leiomyoma, differentiation between focal adenomyosis and leiomyoma was not possible. Microscopic foci of adenomyosis were not demonstrated with MR imaging.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Uterine leiomyomas: correlation of MR, histopathologic findings, and symptoms.Radiology, 1986
- The uterus: in vitro MR-anatomic correlation of normal and abnormal specimens.Radiology, 1985
- Gynecologic masses: Value of magnetic resonance imagingAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- MR Imaging of Uterine Leiomyomas and Their ComplicationsJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1985
- Non‐Specificity of Symptoms Related to AdenomyosisActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1984
- Clinical efficiency of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.Radiology, 1983