Missing covariate data within cancer prognostic studies: a review of current reporting and proposed guidelines
Open Access
- 8 June 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 91 (1) , 4-8
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601907
Abstract
Prognostic models play a crucial role in the clinical decision-making process. Unfortunately, missing covariate data impede the construction of valid and reliable models, potentially introducing bias, if handled inappropriately. The extent of missing covariate data within reported cancer prognostic studies, the current handling and the quality of reporting this missing covariate data are unknown. Therefore, a review was conducted of 100 articles reporting multivariate survival analyses to assess potential prognostic factors, published within seven cancer journals in 2002. Missing covariate data is a common occurrence in studies performing multivariate survival analyses, being apparent in 81 of the 100 articles reviewed. The percentage of eligible cases with complete data was obtainable in 39 articles, and was <90% in 17 of these articles. The methods used to handle incomplete covariates were obtainable in 32 of the 81 articles with known missing data and the most commonly reported approaches were complete case and available case analysis. This review has highlighted deficiencies in the reporting of missing covariate data. Guidelines for presenting prognostic studies with missing covariate data are proposed, which if followed should clarify and standardise the reporting in future articles.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reporting of prognostic markers: current problems and development of guidelines for evidence-based practice in the futureBritish Journal of Cancer, 2003
- Missing data: our view of the state of the art.2002
- Missing data: Our view of the state of the art.Psychological Methods, 2002
- USING FULL PROBABILITY MODELS TO COMPUTE PROBABILITIES OF ACTUAL INTEREST TO DECISION MAKERSInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2001
- Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1998
- Guidelines for reporting results of quality of life assessments in clinical trialsQuality of Life Research, 1996
- Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimatesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Review of survival analyses published in cancer journalsBritish Journal of Cancer, 1995
- Tree-structured prediction for censored survival data and the cox modelJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Statistical aspects of prognostic factor studies in oncologyBritish Journal of Cancer, 1994