Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: An in vitro study
- 1 August 1990
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Vol. 98 (2) , 145-153
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70008-z
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracketAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1988
- The effect of different methods of bracket removal onthe amount of residual adhesiveAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1988
- Tensile bond strengths of orthodontic bonding resins and attachments to etched enamelAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1987
- Bonding to porcelain and goldAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1986
- Electrothermal debracketing Part I. An in vitro studyAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1986
- Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to esthetic restorative materials using a silaneAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1984
- A new method for direct bonding orthodontic attachments to porcelain teeth using a silane coupling agent: An in vitro evaluation: Roger G. JohnsonSt. Louis University, St. Louis, Mo.American Journal of Orthodontics, 1980
- Enamel cracks in debonded, debanded, and orthodontically untreated teethAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1980
- Failure at the dental adhesive—etched enamel interfaceJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1974
- Bonding porcelain teeth to acrylic resin denture basesThe Journal of the American Dental Association, 1967