Substance Use Disorder Diagnostic Schedule (SUDDS): The Equivalence and Validity of a Computer‐Administered and an Interviewer‐Administered Format
- 11 April 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research
- Vol. 16 (2) , 250-254
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.1992.tb01371.x
Abstract
In order to evaluate the equivalence of interviewer‐administered and computer‐administered forms of the substance use disorder diagnostic schedule (SUDDS), both forms were presented to 100 substance‐dependent inpatients. An additional 101 psychiatric outpatients were administered one form or the other. For patients who received both forms of the SUDDS, the percentage agreement ranged from 96% for the classification of a lifetime diagnosis of alcohol abuse/dependence to 88% for the classification of current diagnosis of alcohol abuse/dependence (kappa coefficients ranged from 0.709 to 0.865). Overall agreement with a clinician diagnosis (validity) and the two forms of administration varied from 100% for computer‐generated diagnosis of current alcohol abuseldependence to 71% for computer‐generated lifetime diagnosis of drug abuseldependence, when stratified by number of symptoms reported. No consistent differences were found in the performances of the two forms of the SUDDS, and we conclude that they may be used interchangeably.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Self‐Administered Alcoholism Screening Test: A Comparision of Conventional Versus Computer‐Administered FormatsAlcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research, 1991
- Discriminant Analysis of the Self‐Administered Alcoholism Screening TestAlcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research, 1987
- Editor’s note on the special series.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1985
- A Proposed Solution to the Base Rate Problem in the Kappa StatisticArchives of General Psychiatry, 1985
- Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaireJAMA, 1984
- The Predictive Power of Diagnostic Tests and the Effect of Prevalence of IllnessArchives of General Psychiatry, 1983
- Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face-to-face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug, and tobacco use.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1983
- Research Diagnostic CriteriaArchives of General Psychiatry, 1978
- Psychiatrists and a Computer as Interrogators of Patients with Alcohol-Related Illnesses: A ComparisonThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1977
- Diagnostic Criteria for Use in Psychiatric ResearchArchives of General Psychiatry, 1972