Commodity prices and appropriate technology‐some lessons from tin mining
- 1 October 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Development Studies
- Vol. 14 (1) , 35-52
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00220387708421660
Abstract
This paper looks at the economics of the choice of technique in a developing country (Malaysia) as between a labour‐intensive, locally developed method of production (gravel pump tin mining) and a capital intensive method (tin dredging) developed by foreign firms. The ‘appropriateness’ of each technique is evaluated by cost‐benefit analysis, which finds that rankings by private and by social profitabilities are sensitive both to the discount rate (as one might expect) and (rather surprisingly) to the product price. The paper suggests these findings constitute a new argument in favour of schemes to stabilise primary commodity prices.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE EMPLOYMENT-OUTPUT TRADE-OFF IN LDC's—A MICROECONOMIC APPROACHOxford Economic Papers, 1974
- EXPORTS AND THE MALAYSIAN ENGINEERING INDUSTRY: A CASE STUDY OF BACKWARD LINKAGE*Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1973
- EXPORTS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN WEST MALAYSIAOxford Economic Papers, 1973
- Choice of technique in developing countriesThe Journal of Development Studies, 1972
- CONFLICTS BETWEEN OUTPUT AND EMPLOYMENT OBJECTIVES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 1Oxford Economic Papers, 1971
- CHOOSING TECHNIQUES: HANDPOUNDING V. MACHINE-MILLING OF RICE: AN INDIAN CASEOxford Economic Papers, 1965
- Investment Allocation and Technological Choice-A Case of Cotton Spinning TechniquesThe Economic Journal, 1964