Depression rating scales can be related to each other by simple equations
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice
- Vol. 2 (3) , 215-219
- https://doi.org/10.3109/13651509809115359
Abstract
We present evidence that scores on the Montgomery, Hamilton and Beck depression scales are strongly intercorrelated and can be equated to each other. These scales were administered on 107 occasions to patients with major depression. The correlations between scores on each scale were much higher than has been previously reported and, furthermore, the relationships were always well described by a linear function. The close correlations could not be explained by rater biases. We were able to provide validation data for two of the rating scales, demonstrating that our simple models generalize well to a novel dataset. The knowledge that there is a robust relationship between the three scales has practical value for both clinicians and researchers.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of rating scales by consultant psychiatristsPsychiatric Bulletin, 1992
- A structured interview version of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: Reliability and validity.Psychological Assessment, 1989
- A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to ChangeThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1979
- QUANTITATIVE RATING OF DEPRESSIVE STATESActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1975
- A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSIONJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1960