The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement
- 31 August 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Vol. 26 (4) , 480-487
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2005.02.008
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacologyBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2004
- CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trialsBMJ, 2004
- Randomized Controlled Trials in Long-Term Care Residents with Dementia: A Systematic ReviewJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2003
- Reporting of Clinical Details in Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture for the Treatment of Migraine/Headaches and Nausea/VomitingThe Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2003
- Standards for reporting interventions in controlled trials of acupuncture: the STRICTA recommendationsComplementary Therapies in Medicine, 2001
- Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 2001
- Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statementBMJ, 1996
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statementJAMA, 1996
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978