Interim analyses and early termination of clinical trials
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- Vol. 7 (4) , 533-543
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10543409708835205
Abstract
The group sequential tests (GST) are appropriate for performing interim analyses in clinical trials. Various GST are reviewed and compared in this paper in terms of the expected sample size, the maximum sample size and other practical aspects. Also discussed are the p-values of the significant differences for GST. Common problems and difficulties of using GST in practice are examined. One problem is difficulties associated with the delayed data accumulated after a trial is terminated at an interim test. The GST with O'Brien-Fleming type of boundaries are found to be safe in dealing with delayed observations. Possible approaches for performing futility analyses are illustrated with examples. It is recommended that futility analysis with GST be built into the design of large clinical trials.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Randomized Trial of Tirilazad Mesylate in Patients With Acute Stroke (RANTTAS)Stroke, 1996
- Effects of Assumption Violations on Type I Error Rate in Group Sequential MonitoringPublished by JSTOR ,1992
- Monitoring clinical trials: Conditional or predictive power?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Early decision in clinical trials when the treatment differences are smallControlled Clinical Trials, 1985
- Discrete Sequential Boundaries for Clinical TrialsBiometrika, 1983
- Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trialsBiometrika, 1977
- Repeated Significance Tests on Accumulating DataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1969
- Sequential Analysis with Delayed ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1964