UNBIASED AND UNNOTICED VERBAL CONDITIONING: THE DOUBLE AGENT ROBOT PROCEDURE1
- 1 July 1970
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 14 (1) , 99-105
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1970.14-99
Abstract
Subjects who were told they were “experimenters” attempted to reinforce fluent speech in a supposed subject with whom they spoke via intercom. The supposed subject was to say nouns, one at a time, on request by the “experimenter”, who reinforced fluent pronunciation with points. Actually, the “experimenter” was talking to a multi-track tape recording, one track of which contained fluently spoken nouns, the other track containing disfluently spoken nouns. If the “experimenter's” request for the next noun was in a specified form a word from the fluent track was played to him as reinforcement; requests in any other form produced the word from the disfluent track. Repeated conditioning of specific forms of requests was accomplished with two subject-“experimenters,” who were unable to describe changes in their own behavior, or the contingencies applied. This technique improved upon an earlier method that had yielded similar results, but was less thoroughly controlled against possible human bias.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unnoticed verbal conditioning of an aware experimenter by a more aware subject: The double-agent effect.Psychological Review, 1969
- Descriptive behaviorism versus cognitive theory in verbal operant conditioning.Psychological Review, 1966
- Induced mediating states in verbal conditioningJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963
- The effects of awareness on verbal conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961