Ovulation, p53 Mutations, and Ovarian Cancer--a Causal Link?
Open Access
- 2 July 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 89 (13) , 906-907
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/89.13.906
Abstract
Epidemiologic evidence suggests that the more a woman ovulates, the greater her risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. For example, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use, both suppressors of ovulation, appear to protect against the disease. To account for the evidence, Fathalla ( 1 ) hypothesized that cancers arise as a result of some concomitant of ovulation, such as increased cellular proliferation following rupture of the epithelium at release of the follicle.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relationship Between Lifetime Ovulatory Cycles and Overexpression of Mutant p53 in 932 Epithelial Ovarian CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1997
- p53 protein expression in putative precursor lesions of epithelial ovarian cancerHistopathology, 1995
- Immunohistochemical Detection of p53 Protein in Borderline and Malignant Serous Ovarian TumorsInternational Journal of Gynecological Pathology, 1994
- Prognostic significance of p53 immunostaining in epithelial ovarian cancer.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1994
- p53 accumulation in ovarian carcinomas and its prognostic implicationsHuman Pathology, 1993
- Characteristics Relating to ovarian Cancer Risk: Collaborative Analysis of 12 US case-Control StudiesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- Detection of p53 Gene Mutations in Human Ovarian and Endometrial Cancers by Polymerase Chain Reaction‐Single Strand Conformation Polymorphism AnalysisJapanese Journal of Cancer Research, 1992
- Overexpression of the p53 protein and allele loss at 17p13 in ovarian carcinomaBritish Journal of Cancer, 1992
- Age-related factors in cancers of the breast, ovary, and endometriumJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- INCESSANT OVULATION—A FACTOR IN OVARIAN NEOPLASIA ?The Lancet, 1971