Age, Sex-Role Categorization, and Psychological Health in American Homosexual and Heterosexual Men and Women
- 1 April 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 125 (2) , 203-211
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1985.9922873
Abstract
An examination (N = 569) was made of the following hypotheses: (a) Homosexuals would be classified as androgynous more frequently than heterosexuals, and (b) age would have a more negative impact on self-concept, as measured by self-esteem and depression scores, in homosexual males than in heterosexual males. Results showed that homosexual men and women were more frequently androgynous than were heterosexual men and women. Age did not have a more negative impact on self-concept in homosexual men. The most potent predictor of psychological well-being was self-perceived masculinity scores. Self-esteem increased in all four groups as the masculinity scores increased.This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Androgyny and psychosocial development among college students and adultsJournal of Personality, 1982
- A Descriptive and Analytical Account of Lesbians in a Metropolitan AreaContemporary Psychology, 1980
- Disclosure of Sexual Orientation and Impressions of Male and Female HomosexualsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1980
- Aging Labels: The Decline of Control and the Fall of Self‐EsteemJournal of Social Issues, 1980
- Ageism: A ForewordJournal of Social Issues, 1980
- The many faces of androgyny: A reply to Locksley and Colten.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- The enigma of androgyny: Differential implications for males and females?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978
- Sex role stereotypes: Effect on perceptions of self and others and on personal adjustment.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1976
- Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- Sex‐Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal1Journal of Social Issues, 1972