Cognitive biases and their impact on strategic planning
- 1 April 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Strategic Management Journal
- Vol. 5 (2) , 129-137
- https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050204
Abstract
Subjective judgements by planners and managers are a major component in the process of strategic planning. If such judgements are faulty, efforts at better strategic plans are likely to be misdirected. This paper discusses those biases which appear common to both managers and planners when they make judgements about risk. Implications of biased judgement are discussed in a planning context. Although we still do not know the best ways to elicit judgements, the paper concludes with a discussion of subjective sensitivity analysis which appears to offer some hope.This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Screening policy options: An approach and a case study exampleStrategic Management Journal, 1982
- Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977
- The illusion of control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974
- Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probabilityCognitive Psychology, 1973
- On the psychology of prediction.Psychological Review, 1973
- Belief in the law of small numbers.Psychological Bulletin, 1971
- Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1969
- Importance of variance preferences in gambling decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968
- THE CONCEPT OF CORRELATION IN ADULTSScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1963