How much “effort” should be devoted to memory?
- 1 May 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Memory & Cognition
- Vol. 17 (3) , 337-348
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03198472
Abstract
We focus on the issue of whether cognitive effort is causally related to memory. We begin with a discussion of the concept of cognitive effort as derived from capacity models of attention. We then suggest that the theoretical analysis of memory may involve concepts from different levels of psychological analysis, and we draw a distinction between concepts that represent boundary conditions and sufficient cause. When applied to memory phenomena, attentional concepts serve only as a boundary-or limiting-function in memory theory. In contrast, concepts that represent memorial processes serve as a sufficient cause function. In some instances, cognitive effort appears to have been used as a sufficient cause concept, resulting in some confusion. A review of the literature reveals a haphazard correlation between indexes of cognitive effort and of memory performance. Alternatively, the application of cognitive effort or capacity to the memory performance of certain populations (clinical, children, and elderly) illustrates a potentially more appropriate use of the concept.This publication has 82 references indexed in Scilit:
- Memory and aging: Implications for theories of memory development during childhoodDevelopmental Review, 1985
- When comprehension difficulty improves memory for text.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1985
- Categorization and response competition: Two nonautomatic factors.Psychological Review, 1985
- Task difficulty and pupillary dilation during incidental learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1981
- Processing depth, elaboration of encoding, memory stores, and expended processing capacity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979
- Use of cognitive capacity in reading identical texts with different amounts of discourse level meaning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979
- Reading and cognitive capacity usage: Effects of text difficulty.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978
- The contributions of encoding effort and variability to the spacing effect on free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976
- Memorial consequences of automatized encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975
- Development of free recall learning in children.Developmental Psychology, 1971