Atrophic variants of dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Dermal atrophy of more than 50% of the locoregional dermis may be the predominant histopathological feature in dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. This may cause diagnostic difficulties. In the present study 26 cases of atrophic dermatofibroma were compared with three cases of atrophic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Clinically, both conditions mostly occurred on the (upper) trunk of females. While atrophic dermatofibroma usually presented as a reddish, umbilicated lesion (0.5–1‐cm), often suspected to be a basal cell carcinoma, atrophic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans showed irregularly arranged tan‐brown plaques (3–6 cm). Histologically, atrophic dermatofibroma showed a regular silhouette with a smooth nodular (9/26) or scalloped lower margin with an intervening lace‐like pattern of superficial fatty tissue infiltration (17/26) and variable sclerosis; atrophic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans showed a deep, irregular infiltration of fatty tissue in a lacelike/honeycomb and/ or multilayered pattern, but no sclerosis. Immunohistochemically, atrophic dermatofibroma was mostly negative with QBEnd 10 (CD34; 24/26), variably positive for factor XIIIa (20/26) and metallothionein (11/26). Labelling for factor XIIIa and metallothionein was usually seen in ‘early’ (metabolically active) lesions, while ‘late’ sclerotic ones were negative. In contrast to atrophic dermatofibroma all three atrophic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans showed a consistently uniform profile: CD34 positive, factor XIIIa and metallothionein negative. Our study delineates atrophic dermatofibroma and atrophic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans as distinct entities clearly distinguishable from each other by clinicopathologic criteria.