Analysis of results related to good and bad outcomes of Intacs implantation for keratoconus correction
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 32 (5) , 756-761
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.012
Abstract
To evaluate factors influencing good and poor outcomes after intracorneal ring segment implantation to correct keratoconus. Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante (Vissum Corporation), University of Miguel Hernandez, Alicante, Spain. A retrospective comparative study of the visual outcome, 25 eyes of 21 patients were implanted after intracorneal ring segments (Intacs, Addition Technology) as a method to correct keratoconus. Outcomes were evaluated 6 months after implantation based on the visual results. Group A comprised 20 eyes that gained 3 lines or more of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) to correct keratoconus, and Group B comprised 5 eyes that lost 1 line of BSCVA. In Group A, the preoperative mean BSCVA was 0.43 (20/50) and the postoperative mean BSCVA, 0.82 (20/20) (P< or =.0001). In Group B, the preoperative mean BSCVA was 0.36 (20/63) and the postoperative mean BSCVA, 0.24 (20/80) (P< or =.02). The preoperative mean sphere power was 3.90 diopters (D) greater in Group B than in Group A (P< or =.007); the mean spherical equivalent was 4.36 D greater (P< or =.007), and the mean K-reading was 6.91 D greater (P< or =.001). The postoperative reduction in spherical dioptric power was 2.11 D (P< or =.027) and the mean spherical equivalent, 2.81 D (P< or =.003), significant only in Group A. The reduction in mean central K-readings was 4.30 D (P< or =.0001) in Group A and 6.19 D (P< or =.014) in Group B. The correlation of the preoperative mean K value to the postoperative BSCVA was significant at the .01 level by the Pearson test (-0.67). In Group A, all eyes (100%) had a mean K-reading < or =53 D. In Group B, 4 eyes (80%) had a mean K-reading > or =55 D. Intacs provided better results in visual acuity and corneal topography quality and significantly reduced the spherical equivalent in eyes with keratoconus with relatively low mean K values (< or =53 D) and a relatively low spherical equivalent. In advanced keratoconus (mean K-reading > or =55 D), poor results can be anticipated.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intracorneal Asymmetrical Rings for Keratoconus: Where Should the Thicker Segment Be Implanted?Journal of Refractive Surgery, 2006
- One or 2 Intacs segments for the correction of keratoconusJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2005
- Changes in keratoconic corneas after intracorneal ring segment explantation and reimplantation*1Ophthalmology, 2004
- Clinical characteristics of lamellar channel deposits after implantation of IntacsJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2000
- Correcting keratoconus with intracorneal ringsJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2000
- Changes in anterior and posterior corneal curvatures in keratoconusPublished by Elsevier ,2000
- Three year results of photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy for mild and atypical keratoconusJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1998
- KeratoconusSurvey of Ophthalmology, 1998
- PRK in patients with a keratoconic topography picture. The concept of a physiological 'displaced apex syndrome'.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1996
- Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disordersPublished by Elsevier ,1984