Screening for Lung Cancer
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Thoracic Imaging
- Vol. 15 (1) , 21-27
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005382-200001000-00005
Abstract
Screening for lung cancer has remained controversial since the completion, more than two decades ago, of the three large randomized controlled trials, sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, which led to the recommendation against screening by major medical organizations. Details of the controversy are given, which include concerns about the study design, implementation, and analysis. New evidence about the potential benefit of screening with chest radiography that has emerged since the completion of those trials is reviewed, as well as the results of studies of CT screening for lung cancer.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung CancerChest, 1997
- Survival for clinical stage I lung cancer not surgically treated. Comparison between screen-detected and symptom-detected casesCancer, 1992
- Screening for lung cancerPostgraduate Medicine, 1990
- Screening for Lung CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1990
- Screening for Lung CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1989
- Natural History of Adenocarcinoma-Large Cell Carcinoma of the Lung: Conclusions From Screening Programs in New York and BaltimoreJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1988
- Impact of Early Detection on the Clinical Course of Lung CancerSurgical Clinics of North America, 1987
- Lung Cancer Screening: The Mayo ProgramJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1986
- Survival and Mortality from Lung Cancer in a Screened PopulationChest, 1986
- Screening for Early Lung CancerChest, 1984