Medical Treatment of Cysticercosis: Ineffective vs Effective
- 1 October 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Neurology
- Vol. 52 (10) , 941
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1995.00540340017003
Abstract
In the section "Controversies in Neurology" of the January issue of theArchives, Kramer1and Del Brutto2do a commendable job of defending opposed positions about the role of antiparasitic therapy in the management of neurocysticercosis. We would like, however, to discuss the final statements of the section editor, Dr Hachinski,3that placebo-controlled therapeutic trials for neurocysticercosis are not plausible for ethical reasons. The actual knowledge of the evolution of untreated cysticercosis is scarce and based on anecdotal case reports.4,5Selection bias affects the validity of these reports: cases with more severe symptoms will be more likely to be chosen for study since patients with milder symptoms will be less likely to seek medical attention. "Historical" controls (patients who had computed tomographic studies performed before treatment) have also shown that lesions do not significantly increase in number or size.6,7These historical controls were selected fromKeywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medical Treatment of CysticercosisArchives of Neurology, 1995
- Medical Treatment of Cysticercosis--EffectiveArchives of Neurology, 1995
- Medical Treatment of Cysticercosis--IneffectiveArchives of Neurology, 1995
- The Course of Seizures after Treatment for Cerebral CysticercosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992