Prosthetic Heart Valves: Which Ones and Why
- 1 January 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Hospital Practice
- Vol. 13 (1) , 63-69
- https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1978.11707257
Abstract
The type and to some extent the size of prosthesis are by far the most important factors determining the patient's prognosis. Extensive necropsy experience shows that in terms hemodynamics, thrombogenesis, and deterioration—the three major criteria—none of the four main types of prosthetic valves in use today is ideal. Emphasis is placed on the role of the referring cardiologist in the choice of surgeon and prosthesis.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Structural changes in porcine xenografts used as substitute cardiac valves: Gross and histologic observations in 51 glutaraldehyde-preserved Hancock valves in 41 patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1977
- Choosing a substitute cardiac valve: Type, size, surgeonThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1976
- Cardiac pathology after valve replacement with a tilting disc prosthesis (Björk-Shiley type)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1976
- Cardiac pathology after valve replacement by disc prosthesis: A study of 61 necropsy patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1975
- Cardiac pathology after aortic valve replacement using Hufnagel trileaflet prostheses: a study of 20 necropsy patientsAmerican Heart Journal, 1975
- Pathologic anatomy of cardiac valve replacement: A study of 224 necropsy patientsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1973