SOCIAL POLYANDRY, PARENTAL INVESTMENT, SEXUAL SELECTION, AND EVOLUTION OF REDUCED FEMALE GAMETE SIZE
Open Access
- 1 January 2004
- Vol. 58 (1) , 24-34
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01570.x
Abstract
Sexual selection in the form of sperm competition is a major explanation for small size of male gametes. Can sexual selection in polyandrous species with reversed sex roles also lead to reduced female gamete size? Comparative studies show that egg size in birds tends to decrease as a lineage evolves social polyandry. Here, a quantitative genetic model predicts that female scrambles over mates lead to evolution of reduced female gamete size. Increased female mating success drives the evolution of smaller eggs, which take less time to produce, until balanced by lowered offspring survival. Mean egg size is usually reduced and polyandry increased by increasing sex ratio (male bias) and maximum possible number of mates. Polyandry also increases with the asynchrony (variance) in female breeding start. Opportunity for sexual selection increases with the maximum number of mates but decreases with increasing sex ratio. It is well known that parental investment can affect sexual selection. The model suggests that the influence is mutual: owing to a coevolutionary feedback loop, sexual selection in females also shapes initial parental investment by reducing egg size. Feedback between sexual selection and parental investment may be common.Keywords
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reproductive tactics of the ringed plover Charadrius hiaticulaJournal of Avian Biology, 2003
- Clutch size limitation in waders: experimental test in redshank Tringa totanusOecologia, 2002
- Male and female mate choice affects offspring quality in a sex–role–reversed pipefishProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2000
- Sex Roles Are Not Always Reversed When the Potential Reproductive Rate Is Higher in FemalesThe American Naturalist, 1999
- Ornaments or offspring: costs to reproductive success restrict sexual selection processesBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1995
- Potential Reproductive Rates and the Operation of Sexual SelectionThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1992
- Risk avoidance and nesting strategiesJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1984
- Why are there so many tiny sperm? Sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexesJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1982
- Evolution of Polyandry in BirdsAmerican Zoologist, 1974
- Intra-sexual selection in DrosophilaHeredity, 1948