Is Pregnancy Necessary? Feminist Concerns About Ectogenesis
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Hypatia
- Vol. 4 (3) , 66-84
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1989.tb00592.x
Abstract
To what extent are women obliged to be child-bearers? If reproductive technology could offer some form of ectogenesis, would feminists regard it as a liberating reproductive option? Three lines of reproductive rights arguments currently used by feminists are applied to ectogenesis. Each fails to provide strong grounds for prohibiting it. Yet, there are several ways in which ectogenesis could contribute to women's oppression, in particular, if it were used to undermine abortion rights, reinforce traditional views of fertility, increase fetal rights in pregnancy, and perpetuate the unequal distribution of scarce medical resources. A re-thinking of women's relationship to pregnancy is needed in order to challenge ectogenetic research.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early human pregnancy in vitro utilizing an artificially perfused uterusFertility and Sterility, 1988
- ECTOGENESIS, JUSTICE AND UTILITY: A REPLY TO JAMESBioethics, 1987
- In vitro teratogenicity of ethylenethiourea in the ratTeratology, 1987
- The in vitro fertilization pregnancy rate: let’s be honest with one anotherFertility and Sterility, 1985
- Bioethics of IVF--the state of the debate.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1984