Comparison of Charge Densities and Pseudo Charge Densities for
- 17 July 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review Letters
- Vol. 41 (3) , 197-200
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.41.197
Abstract
We compare the charge densities of the orbitals of calculated from Hartree-Fock-Slater self-consistent-field wave functions and pseudo charge densities from a local pseudopotential and found considerable differences. Given that the former are correct, this means that physically misleading conclusions could be drawn from the pseudo charge density. While pseudopotential methods have added much insight, current pseudocharge calculations for molecules and surfaces could be unreliable indicators of the true charge density.
Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pseudocharge densities and the (110) surface of GaAsPhysical Review B, 1978
- Self-consistent pseudopotential calculations for Ge and diamond (111) surfacesPhysical Review B, 1978
- Hydrogen Chemisorption on Si: A New Type of Chemisorptive BondPhysical Review Letters, 1977
- A solid-state approach to SCF Xα molecular equationsChemical Physics Letters, 1977
- Nonlocal pseudopotential calculations for the electronic structure of eleven diamond and zinc-blende semiconductorsPhysical Review B, 1976
- The electronic structure of solid surfacesReviews of Modern Physics, 1976
- Comment on the Relation of Relaxation to Electronic-Energy-Level Structure on the Si(111) SurfacePhysical Review Letters, 1976
- Self-consistent pseudopotential method for localized configurations: MoleculesPhysical Review B, 1975
- Self-consistent pseudopotential calculations for Si (111) surfaces: Unreconstructed (1×1) and reconstructed (2×1) model structuresPhysical Review B, 1975
- Self-consistent molecular Hartree—Fock—Slater calculations I. The computational procedureChemical Physics, 1973