Actinomyces naeslundii genospecies 1 and 2 express different binding specificities to N‐acetyl‐β‐D‐galactosamine, whereas Actinomyces odontolyticus expresses a different binding specificity in colonizing the human mouth
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Oral Microbiology and Immunology
- Vol. 13 (6) , 327-336
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302x.1998.tb00687.x
Abstract
A total of 102 strains of Actinomyces were isolated from teeth, buccal mucosa and tongue in eight individuals. The isolates were characterized by multivariate statistical analyses of phenotypic characteristics, serotyping and binding to β‐linked galactosamine (N‐acetyl‐β‐D‐galactosamine) and acidic proline‐rich protein structures. Based on these characteristics, isolates were classified into three major groups: (i) Isolates of Actinomyces naeslundii genospecies 2 were the dominant species on teeth and buccal mucosa and bound commonly to Nacetyl‐β‐D‐galactosamine (63 of 63 isolates) and acidic proline‐rich proteins (63 of 63 isolates), regardless of tissue origin. They all exhibited a N‐acetyl‐β‐D‐galactosamine binding specificity signified by N‐acetyl‐β‐D‐galactosamine‐inhibitable coaggregation with the streptococcal strains LVG1. GVE1, 24892 and MPB1; (ii) Isolates of A. naeslundii genospecies 1 were prevalent on teeth in certain individuals and bound commonly to N‐acetyl‐β‐D‐galactosamine (20 of 20 isolates), but less commonly to acidic proline‐rich proteins (5 of 20 isolates). They all possessed another N‐acetyl‐β‐D‐galactosamine specificity, i.e. N‐acetyl‐β‐D‐galactosamine‐in‐hibitable coaggregation with the same streptococcal strains except for strain MPB1; (iii) Isolates of Actinomyces odontolyticus, the dominant species on the tongue (17 of 19 isolates), bound commonly to unknown structures on streptococci (17 of 19 isolates) but rarely to N‐acetyl‐β‐D‐galactosamine (2 of 19 isolates) or acidic proline‐rich proteins (3 of 19 isolates). In conclusion, A. naeslundii genospecies 1 and 2 exhibit different patterns of N‐acetyl‐β‐D‐galactosamine and acidic proline‐rich protein specificities to colonize dental and buccal mucosa surfaces, whereas A. odontolyticus utilizes another specificity to colonize the tongue.Keywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ribotype diversity of Actinomyces With similar intraoral tropism but different types of N‐acetyl‐β‐d‐galactosamine binding specificityOral Microbiology and Immunology, 1998
- Human Salivary Acidic Proline-rich Protein Polymorphisms and Biosynthesis Studied by High-performance Liquid ChromatographyJournal of Dental Research, 1994
- Pilus and nonpilus bacterial adhesins: Assembly and function in cell recognitionCell, 1993
- Do Proline-rich Proteins Modulate a Transglutaminase Catalyzed Mechanism of Candidal Adhesion?Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, 1993
- CHAPERONE-ASSISTED ASSEMBLY AND MOLECULAR ARCHITECTURE OF ADHESIVE PILIAnnual Review of Microbiology, 1991
- A Use's Guide to Principal ComponentsPublished by Wiley ,1991
- Microbiology of Root Surface Caries in HumansJournal of Dental Research, 1990
- Bacterial Adhesion to Oral Tissues: A Model for Infectious DiseasesJournal of Dental Research, 1989
- The primary structures of six human salivary acidic proline-rich proteins (PRP-1, PRP-2, PRP-3, PRP-4, PIF-s and PIF-f)Biochemical Journal, 1988
- The Function and Distribution of Different Fimbriae on Strains of Actinomyces viscosus and Actinomyces naeslundiiJournal of Dental Research, 1984