Ten categories of statistical errors: a guide for research in endocrinology and metabolism
Open Access
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Physiological Society in American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Vol. 286 (4) , E495-E501
- https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00484.2003
Abstract
A simple framework is introduced that defines ten categories of statistical errors on the basis of type of error, bias or imprecision, and source: sampling, measurement, estimation, hypothesis testing, and reporting. Each of these ten categories is illustrated with examples pertinent to research and publication in the disciplines of endocrinology and metabolism. Some suggested remedies are discussed, where appropriate. A review of recent issues of American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism and of Endocrinology finds that very small sample sizes may be the most prevalent cause of statistical error in this literature.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trialStatistics in Medicine, 2003
- The Continuing Unethical Conduct of Underpowered Clinical TrialsJAMA, 2002
- The Elements of Statistical LearningPublished by Springer Nature ,2001
- Analysis of Longitudinal Data.Published by JSTOR ,1997
- Formulae for Sample Size, Power and Minimum Detectable Relative Risk in Medical StudiesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1992
- ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTSEvolution, 1989
- A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significanceBiometrika, 1988
- Baby Bear's Dilemma: A Statistical Tale1Agronomy Journal, 1982