PARAMETERS AFFECTING THE ACQUISITION OF SIDMAN AVOIDANCE1

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Four studies were conducted to investigate the source of reinforcement of Sidman avoidance. First it was found that the acquisition of avoidance was seriously impaired if there was no immediate stimulus consequence of responding, i.e., proprioceptive and auditory feedback. The second study showed that if the shock‐shock interval was split so that only responses occurring in one half of the interval were effective in postponing shock, then learning was impaired. It made little difference which half of the interval was used. The third study demonstrated that Ss learn Sidman avoidance more quickly with a variable shock‐shock interval than with the usual fixed‐interval procedure. The results of the second and third experiments argue against the view that avoidance is reinforced by the decrease in conditioned aversiveness that occurs at long post‐shock times. The final experiment indicated that Ss do not learn Sidman avoidance if the response‐produced delay of shock is preceded by a shock, hence it seems unlikely that the crucial source of reinforcement is merely an overall reduction in shock density. All of the findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the avoidance response is reinforced by the decrease in conditioned aversiveness of stimuli at short post‐response times. This seems to be the case even at the beginning of acquisition.

This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit: