Risk Stratification After Myocardial Infarction Using Signal-Averaged Electrocardiographic Criteria Adjusted for Sex, Age, and Myocardial Infarction Location
- 1 July 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 96 (1) , 202-213
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.1.202
Abstract
Background The objectives were to investigate the factors influencing signal-averaged ECGs (SAECGs) recorded in patients after myocardial infarction (MI) and to develop criteria for predicting arrhythmic events (AEs) that account for these factors. Methods and Results SAECGs were recorded 5 to 15 days after MI in 2461 patients without bundle-branch block. The duration (QRSd), terminal potential (VRMS), and terminal duration (LAS) of the filtered QRS were measured. During follow-up (17±8 months), AEs (arrhythmic death; ventricular tachycardia, VT; ventricular fibrillation, VF) occurred in 80 patients (3.3%). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that QRSd discriminated patients with all types of AEs, but VRMS and LAS discriminated only VT patients; QRSd minus LAS also discriminated AE patients. Sex, age, and MI location significantly affected the SAECG; survivors without VT or VF were divided into subgroups (2 sex×4 age×2 MI), and QRSd values exceeding the 70th percentile in each subgroup predicted AEs with a sensitivity of 65.4%. An unadjusted QRSd criterion showed the same overall sensitivity and specificity but with less uniform values for each subgroup. A Cox model was constructed by use of multiple prognostic indicators, and in rank order, QRSd, previous MI, and Killip class were predictive of AEs. Conclusions SAECG adjustments for sex, age, and MI location did not improve sensitivity and specificity but produced a more uniform predictive performance. The proposed criteria are based only on QRSd, because late potentials (VRMS and LAS) did not discriminate patients with sudden death. Duration of high-level activity during QRS (QRSd−LAS) can predict AEs, suggesting that the arrhythmogenic substrate involves a large mass of myocardium.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Value of signal-averaged electrocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography, holter monitoring and clinical variables for prediction of arrhythmic events in survivors of acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic eraJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- Frequency versus time domain analysis of signal-averaged electrocardiograms. III. Stratification of postinfarction patients for arrhythmic eventsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
- Effect of thrombolytic therapy on the predictive value of signal-averaged electrocardiography after acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Predicting arrhythmic events after acute myocardial infarction using the signal-averaged electrocardiogramThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Risk stratification for arrhythmic events in postinfarction patients based on heart rate variability, ambulatory electrocardiographic variables and the signal-averaged electrocardiogramJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Time Course and prognostic significance of serial signal-averaged electrocardiograms after a first acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Prognostic significance of the signal-averaged ECG depends on the time of recording in the postinfarction periodAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Prognostic Significance and Evolution of Late Ventricular Potentials in the First Year After Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective StudyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1989
- Prediction of serious arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction: Signal-averaged electrocardiogram, holter monitoring and radionuclide ventriculographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- Prognostic significance of late ventricular potentials after acute myocardial infarctionEuropean Heart Journal, 1983