Systematic Higher Education Assessment and Departmental Impacts: translating the effort to meet the need
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Quality in Higher Education
- Vol. 1 (3) , 223-234
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1353832950010304
Abstract
Assessments are expected to have impacts. We intuitively assume that assessment is done in order to get information necessary for decision making or self‐development purposes. But assessments may also be utilised in an unexpected way, and they may even have unintended impacts that have nothing to do with the utilisation of the results. The essential purpose of evaluation does not seem to be only to acquire new information, but rather the process of evaluation itself. Assessments may be helpful in closing the information gap between the university central administration and the departments. On the departmental level, assessments give some structure to processes of improvement. Teaching and research seem to be major concerns of the departments, regardless of the official goals and purposes, as departments ‘translate’ the assessments to suit their own needs.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards a general model of quality assessment in higher educationHigher Education, 1994
- Effects of Quality Assessment in Dutch Higher EducationEuropean Journal of Education, 1994
- Defining QualityAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1993
- Quality evaluations in the management of basic and applied researchResearch Policy, 1990
- The Evaluator's responsibility for utilizationEvaluation Practice, 1988
- The Impact of Policy AnalysisPublished by JSTOR ,1988
- Evaluation for decisions: Is anybody there? Does anybody care?Evaluation Practice, 1988
- Decision-Oriented Educational ResearchPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- The Higher Education SystemPublished by University of California Press ,1983
- The Matthew Effect in ScienceScience, 1968