What constitutes ‘balanced information in the practitioners’ portrayals of Down's syndrome?
- 1 September 2002
- Vol. 18 (3) , 230-237
- https://doi.org/10.1054/midw.2002.0316
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Examining Ethics in Practice: health service professionals’ evaluations of in-hospital ethics seminarsNursing Ethics, 2002
- Too many choices? Hospital and community staff reflect on the future of prenatal screeningSocial Science & Medicine, 2002
- Dilemmas encountered by health practitioners offering nuchal translucency screening: a qualitative case studyPrenatal Diagnosis, 2002
- Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing?Social Science & Medicine, 2001
- An exploration of midwives' and obstetricians' knowledge of genetic screening in pregnancy and their perception of appropriate counsellingMidwifery, 2001
- ‘Losing the plot’? Medical and activist discourses of contemporary genetics and disabilitySociology of Health & Illness, 1999
- Eugenics and the New Genetics in Britain: Examining Contemporary Professionals' AccountsScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1998
- Attitudes towards termination for fetal abnormality: comparisons in three European countriesClinical Genetics, 1996
- BASICS OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH - STRAUSS,A, CORBIN,JJournal of Marketing Research, 1992
- Basic Content AnalysisJournal of Marketing Research, 1986