Community response to intermittent preventive treatment delivered to infants (IPTi) through the EPI system in Manhiça, Mozambique
Open Access
- 20 October 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Tropical Medicine & International Health
- Vol. 11 (11) , 1670-1678
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01725.x
Abstract
Objective To describe attitudes to the expanded programme on immunization (EPI) and intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi), and perceptions of the relationship between them. In particular, whether the introduction of IPTi negatively affects community attitudes to, or use of, EPI; or, conversely, whether and if so how, the concurrent delivery of IPTi and immunization influences perceptions of IPTi. Methods Anthropological study carried out in the context of a trial of IPTi with sulphadoxine–pyrimethamine delivered alongside routine EPI vaccinations. We used open in-depth interviews, semi-structured interviews and participant observation, conducted in both community and clinic settings. Results IPTi was generally acceptable, in spite of initial resistance. Perceived negative aspects of IPTi did not affect perceptions of EPI, and IPTi was not misinterpreted as immunization against malaria, leading to a reduction of other preventive measures or delay in treatment seeking. Initial resistance was related more to the trial than to IPTi per se, but both rejection and acceptance were embedded in a complex constellation of local and wider contextual factors. Conclusions IPTi delivered together with EPI was generally accepted after initial rejection. The factors that led to this rejection were largely local and trial related, but they did resonate with much wider cultural themes (rumours about research and health interventions, gender inequality and health-related decision making). The prior acceptance and routine administration of EPI played a key role in the acceptance of IPTi in this community. However, more studies, in different social and cultural settings and using different drugs and regimens, are needed before generalizations can be made. Although trial settings are different from actual implementation, it is necessary to study acceptability before implementation in order to anticipate problems and design information campaigns to ensure maximum community acceptance. Keywords malaria , Mozambique , IPTi , EPI , acceptability , rumoursKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria Control Administered at the Time of Routine Vaccinations in Mozambican Infants: A Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled TrialThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Editorial: Popular concerns about medical research projects in sub‐Saharan Africa – a critical voice in debates about medical research ethicsTropical Medicine & International Health, 2006
- The global distribution of clinical episodes of Plasmodium falciparum malariaNature, 2005
- ‘MMR talk’ and vaccination choices: An ethnographic study in BrightonSocial Science & Medicine, 2005
- Effect of intermittent treatment with amodiaquine on anaemia and malarial fevers in infants in Tanzania: a randomised placebo-controlled trialThe Lancet, 2003
- Malaria in pregnancy in rural Mozambique: the role of parity, submicroscopic and multiple Plasmodium falciparum infectionsTropical Medicine & International Health, 2002
- Intermittent treatment for malaria and anaemia control at time of routine vaccinations in Tanzanian infants: a randomised, placebo-controlled trialThe Lancet, 2001
- Sterilizing Vaccines or the Politics of the Womb: Retrospective Study of a Rumor in CameroonMedical Anthropology Quarterly, 2000
- Social and psychological costs of preventive child health services in HaitiSocial Science & Medicine, 1994
- The Acceptability of Childhood Immunization to Togolese Mothers: A Sociobehavioral PerspectiveHealth Education Quarterly, 1991