The Effect of a Central Task on Luminance Thresholds for Peripherally Presented Stimuli
- 1 August 1969
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Vol. 11 (4) , 387-391
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872086901100409
Abstract
The effect of a central task on peripheral vision was investigated by obtaining luminance thresholds for stimuli presented from 20° to 90° in the periphery. A control group observed a steady foveal fixation light. For the two experimental groups, the fixation light was interrupted periodically and the subject was required to maintain illumination of the light by pressing a button. Interruption rates of 15 and 53 times per minute were investigated. The control condition with the steady fixation light produced the lowest thresholds. For the interrupted conditions, thresholds were higher for the near periphery but differences disappeared in the far periphery. Luminance threshold values were generally highest for the 15-per-minute interrupted group. The results are interpreted as reflecting the effect of an attention-demanding central task on the size of the functional visual field.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- How we see.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,2006
- Perceptual Narrowing in Novice DiversHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1966
- Visual noise causes tunnel visionPsychonomic Science, 1965
- Influence on extreme peripheral vision of attention to a visual or auditory task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964
- The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior.Psychological Review, 1959
- The Restriction of Peripheral Vision during Exposure to Hot and Humid ConditionsQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958
- Effect of Flash and Field Luminance upon Human Reaction Time*Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1954
- Effect of incentives upon reactions to peripheral stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952