Debate: The slippery slope of surrogate outcomes
Open Access
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Springer Nature in Trials
- Vol. 1 (2) , 76-78
- https://doi.org/10.1186/cvm-1-2-076
Abstract
Surrogate outcomes are frequently used in cardiovascular disease research. A concern is that changes in surrogate markers may not reflect changes in disease outcomes. Two recent clinical trials (Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study [HERS], and the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial [ALLHAT]) underscore this problem since their results contradicted what was expected based on the surrogate outcomes. The current regulatory policy to allow new therapies to be introduced onto the market based solely on surrogate outcomes may need to be reviewed.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs chlorthalidone: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group.2000
- Major Cardiovascular Events in Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Doxazosin vs Chlorthalidone: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)JAMA, 2000
- Surrogate End Points, Health Outcomes, and the Drug-Approval Process for the Treatment of Risk Factors for Cardiovascular DiseaseJAMA, 1999
- Randomized Trial of Estrogen Plus Progestin for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in Postmenopausal WomenJAMA, 1998
- Prevention of peanut allergyThe Lancet, 1998
- Preventing Neural Tube DefectsPediatric Annals, 1997
- Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertensionThe Lancet, 1997
- Prevention of Heart Failure by Antihypertensive Drug Treatment in Older Persons With Isolated Systolic HypertensionJAMA, 1997
- Surrogates, Semantics, and Sensible Public PolicyCirculation, 1997
- Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1996