Racial Variation in the Use of Coronary-Revascularization Procedures — Are the Differences Real? Do They Matter?
Open Access
- 13 February 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 336 (7) , 480-486
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199702133360706
Abstract
Studies have reported that blacks undergo fewer coronary-revascularization procedures than whites, but it is not clear whether the clinical characteristics of the patients account for these differences or whether they indicate underuse of the procedures in blacks or overuse in whites. In a study at Duke University of 12,402 patients (10.3 percent of whom were black) with coronary disease, we calculated unadjusted and adjusted rates of angioplasty and bypass surgery in blacks and whites after cardiac catheterization. We also examined patterns of treatment after stratifying the patients according to the severity of disease, angina status, and estimated survival benefit due to revascularization. Finally, we compared five-year survival rates in blacks and whites. After adjustment for the severity of disease and other characteristics, blacks were 13 percent less likely than whites to undergo angioplasty and 32 percent less likely to undergo bypass surgery. The adjusted black:white odds ratios for receiving these procedures were 0.87 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.73 to 1.03) and 0.68 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.82), respectively. The racial differences in rates of bypass surgery persisted among those with severe anginal symptoms (31 percent of blacks underwent surgery, vs. 45 percent of whites; P<0.001) and among those predicted to have the greatest survival benefit from revascularization (42 percent vs. 61 percent, P<0.001). Finally, unadjusted and adjusted rates of survival for five years were significantly lower in blacks than in whites. Blacks with coronary disease were significantly less likely than whites to undergo coronary revascularization, particularly bypass surgery — a difference that could not be explained by the clinical features of their disease. The differences in treatment were most pronounced among those predicted to benefit the most from revascularization. Since these differences also correlated with a lower survival rate in blacks, we conclude that coronary revascularization appears to be underused in blacks.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of gender, race, and education on patient preferences and receipt of cardiac catheterizations among coronary care unit patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists CollaborationPublished by Elsevier ,1994
- Continuing differences in the rates of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass graft surgery between elderly black and white Medicare beneficiariesAmerican Heart Journal, 1994
- Racial Differences in the Use of Invasive Cardiovascular Procedures in the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical SystemNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Characteristics of black patients admitted to coronary care units in metropolitan Seattle: Results from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry (MITI)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Coronary artery bypass surgery and coronary angiography in the United States, 1979–1983American Heart Journal, 1987
- Accuracy and interobserver variability of coronary cineangiography: A comparison with postmortem evaluationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1984
- Coronary arteriography and coronary artery bypass surgery: morbidity and mortality in patients ages 65 years or older. A report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study.Circulation, 1983
- Evaluating the yield of medical testsJAMA, 1982
- Survival in medically treated coronary artery disease.Circulation, 1979