Specification Search in Structural Equation Modeling (SEM): How Gradient Component-wise Boosting can Contribute
Open Access
- 24 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
- Vol. 29 (1) , 140-150
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.1935263
Abstract
Although structural equation model (SEM) is a powerful and widely applied tool particularly in social sciences, few studies have explored how SEM and statistical learning methods can be combined. The purpose of this paper is to explore how gradient component-wise boosting (GCB) can contribute to item selection. We ran 200 regressions with different farmer psychological variables collected to explain variation in an animal welfare indicator (AWI). The most frequently selected variables from the regressions were selected to build a SEM to explain variation in the AWI. The results show that boosting selects relevant items for a SEM.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Penalty Approach to Differential Item Functioning in Rasch ModelsPsychometrika, 2015
- Structural equation model trees.Psychological Methods, 2013
- Exploratory Structural Equation ModelingStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
- Boosting additive models using component-wise P-SplinesComputational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2008
- Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine.The Annals of Statistics, 2001
- The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.Psychological Bulletin, 2001
- The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.Psychological Bulletin, 2001
- Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting (With discussion and a rejoinder by the authors)The Annals of Statistics, 2000
- Arcing classifier (with discussion and a rejoinder by the author)The Annals of Statistics, 1998
- The strength of weak learnabilityMachine Learning, 1990