Political Institutions and Electric Utility Investment: A Cross-Nation Analysis
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in California Management Review
- Vol. 40 (2) , 18-35
- https://doi.org/10.2307/41165931
Abstract
The likelihood that a government will meet its promises varies with the structure of a nation's political institutions. Where multiple independent actors wield veto power over potential policy changes, macroeconomic, tax, and regulatory stability will be enhanced—thus reducing the variance on an investment project's expected return. This relationship is shown to hold for an industry with extremely high sunk costs and politicization, namely, electric utilities. Managers considering investment in infrastructure projects should therefore evaluate the investment proposal not only on its explicit terms, but also on the likelihood that the government will honor them.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regulations, Institutions, and CommitmentPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996
- International Comparisons of Electricity RegulationPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996
- Behind the Revolving Door: A New View of Public Utility RegulationThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1995
- Political Credibility and Economic DevelopmentPublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- Presidents and AssembliesPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1992
- Trigger Price RegulationThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1992
- InstitutionsJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1991
- Congressional Influence on BureaucracyJournal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1990
- Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade CommissionJournal of Political Economy, 1983
- Regulation and Administered ContractsThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1976