The person as co‐investigator in personality research
- 1 June 1991
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in European Journal of Personality
- Vol. 5 (3) , 199-216
- https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410050303
Abstract
In this paper, arguments are presented for considering the subject as co‐investigator in personality research. A review of current research methods suggests that personality psychology is well on its way to recognizing the individual as an expert on his or her own self and situation. This means that the subject should also be allowed to take a much more active role in psychological research. It is argued that the ideal methodology for accomplishing this integration of the individual into psychological research is to establish a dialogue between psychologist and subject, allowing each to contribute to the scientific process from his or her own perspective and on the basis of his or her own expertise. The present approach calls for greater emphasis on the organization and coherence of personality as a system, greater openness and sensitivity to the particular world of the individual, and an even more dynamic conception of individuality than is currently found in our field. An important implication of the open system approach advocated in this article, the reduced role of prediction in personality research, is discussed and, finally, a preliminary list of expected gains and losses is presented.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues on the prediction of behaviorJournal of Personality, 1983
- The act frequency approach to personality.Psychological Review, 1983
- Aggregation, moderator variables, and the validity of personality tests: A peer-rating study.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982
- DisseminationPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1981
- The stability of behavior: II. Implications for psychological research.American Psychologist, 1980
- On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior.Psychological Review, 1974
- The general and the unique in psychological science1Journal of Personality, 1962
- The open system in personality theory.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960
- Issues distinguishing idiographic from nomothetic approaches to personality theory.Psychological Review, 1956
- The science of personality: Nomothetic.Psychological Review, 1954