Health Reform: The Good, The Bad, And The Bottom Line
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 13 (1) , 115-131
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.13.1.115
Abstract
The Health Security Act is a pragmatic plan for achieving universal health insurance coverage for a broad package of benefits at reasonable cost. It proposes necessary and reasonable changes in insurance market practices and administrative structure. It finances the reformed system with a credible combination of achievable cost savings, mandatory private-sector payments, and limited “sin” taxes. Political constraints—the inability to tax openly or redistribute tax subsidies— result in weak incentives for consumers to choose low-cost plans and an inefficient scheme for providing subsidies to the poor. The act also unnecessarily restricts and regulates fee-for-service plans and the training of health workers. We propose changes to correct the act's weaknesses without compromising its basic objectives.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Should physicians be permitted to ‘balance bill’ patients?Journal of Health Economics, 1993
- Ownership and Organizational PerformanceMedical Care, 1992
- Physician Participation in Medicaid RevisitedMedical Care, 1991
- Competition And Cost Containment In California: 1980–1987Health Affairs, 1989
- Medically Inappropriate Hospital Use in a Pediatric PopulationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- New Estimates of the Incidence of the Payroll TaxSouthern Economic Journal, 1979